Arnaud SAINT-MARTIN
@anou91
The issue of the release of Pavel Durov, the founder and general director of Telegram, raises an intense and controversial debate. Accused by several governments of encouraging non-compliance with local laws by allowing unmonitored communication through his platform, Durov is also defended by those who see him as a champion of freedom of expression and the protection of privacy. Many of his supporters argue that he is the victim of unfair accusations aimed at restricting digital freedom and imposing state surveillance on private communications. This debate highlights fundamental questions about the balance between national security, individual privacy, and digital freedoms. 🆓 What place should privacy protection have in our society? 🤔 Should freedom of expression take precedence over national security concerns? 👀 It is these crucial questions ❓ that we will explore when discussing the case of Pavel Durov and Telegram. 🗣️ #FREEDUROV 📲🔗🤞 #KeepPhavering 🦄 #vivelaFrance 🇫…
5 replies
1 recast
14 reactions
Grignute
@grignute
I am for total freedom of expression. Even if I don't agree with what others write, they have the right to express themselves. It seems to me that the more people are forbidden from expressing themselves, the more they want to do so.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Arnaud SAINT-MARTIN
@anou91
Exactly. This is Human Nature. We love everything it's forbidden. But I think the government and French lawyer wants to control everything, so Telegram is out of control for them and they don't like it.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
