Griesson
@griesson
91 Following
6 Followers
Casts
Casts + replies
Griesson
@griesson
How the "Gambler's Fallacy" Makes You Unhappy and Hurts Your Chances in Crypto The "Gambler's Fallacy" was discovered in Monte Carlo. On August 18, 1913, the roulette ball landed on black 26 times in a row. Players kept betting on red, convinced it was "due," but black kept coming.👇
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Griesson
@griesson
GM! I will follow everyone who follows međź‘Ś
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Griesson
@griesson
I just registered for @ampsfun
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Griesson
@griesson
Build long term things with long term people
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Griesson
@griesson
I found this GM in a bottle. 🏝️🍾 Generated with premium-grade energy, courtesy of 🔵 @basefrens 🔵
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Griesson
@griesson
I just minted my Faces of Farcaster collectible. A custom, onchain art collection exclusively for Farcasters by @harmonybot and @sayangel
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Griesson
@griesson
I'm a Speculator-Pragmatist (3.0, 3.0) on the Onchain Alignment Chart! Check out your position:
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Griesson
@griesson
Too Much Information: Why more choices can make us less satisfied — In theory, having more options seems great, but in reality, it can overwhelm us. With the internet giving us access to endless data and choices, you'd think it makes decision-making easier. But the opposite is often true — too many options can lead to overload and decision paralysis. Experiments show that the more options we have, the less satisfied we are with our final choice. Too many options can lead to decision anxiety and even regret, leaving us less happy with our decisions. Companies know this: Many, like supermarkets, have reduced the number of available options to simplify choices for customers and improve efficiency. More isn’t always better — sometimes, fewer choices can actually lead to better decisions and greater satisfaction. How do you feel when faced with too many options? Let’s discuss!
1 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions
Griesson
@griesson
Cognitive Biases That Influence Our Decisions — Ever wondered why we make irrational choices sometimes? Here are some common biases that trick our thinking Survivorship Bias: We tend to focus on successes and ignore failures. Why? Because successful examples are more visible, leading us to overestimate success rates and miss important lessons from failure. Anchoring Effect: First impressions are powerful! We often rely too heavily on the first piece of information we receive, which can skew our decisions later on, even when new info becomes available. Confirmation Bias: We tend to seek out information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore anything that challenges them. It’s why we often stick to opinions we already have — even if they’re wrong! Sunk-cost Fallacy: This bias leads us to continue with projects we’ve already invested time, money, or effort into, even when it no longer makes sense. We hate the idea of "wasting" what’s already been spent.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Griesson
@griesson
How a single person can ruine an entire team's performance Will Felps from the University of New South Wales conducted a fascinating study on the contagious nature of behavior at work. Here's what he found: In the study, teams of 4 students were tasked with solving a management problem in 45 minutes, with the best team promised a $100 reward. What they didn’t know? Some teams had actors with specific disruptive roles. One played a "slacker," who didn’t participate and spent time on their phone. Another was a "jerk," making sarcastic comments like “Is this a joke?” And the last was a "pessimist," who acted as if the task was impossible and the group doomed. Despite the other members being highly talented and motivated, Felps found that having just one of these disruptive actors lowered the team’s performance by a shocking 30-40%!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction