grgw pfp

grgw

@grgw

52 Following
12 Followers
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
self-hosting +1
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Proton
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Yes, please!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Blocking third-party clients (Tweetbot) was the last straw for me
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
also there's no way to Export your email if you want to leave. Skiff is just great though and so hopefully it's on the roadmap.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
nice. were you able to automate it?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Did lead me to check out @multicoincap where ironically all their tweets are now deleted, 'spose you gotta take advantage of those Web 2.0 social features while they're still there ;)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Nice Farcaster overview at 2022 Multicoin Summit - neatly lays out the crypto OG user base approach versus say Lens bottoms-up approach focusing on attracting the web3 creators. Be interesting to see how/where these "meet in the middle". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fW9-dEOSX8A
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Once humans are involved in mechanism execution then "credibly neutral" is gone :( Adding transparency helps but does not solve. Rather web3 social needs *pluggable* algorithms so can contrast feed from diff perspectives e.g. the app's content moderation team vs PensionerModDAO where members are validated aged 65+ :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
No need to actively collaborate unless you’re interested in Urbit’s p2p compute vision btw: I do think there’s reasons to be interested e.g. discouraging centralised systems, sovereign control of your data
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Anyone have experience with Comm https://comm.app/ ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Yep
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Think it’s definitely a useful hook. Creator/fan communities are certainly a web3 thing and those aspiring creators need too see a way to get paid. Does not mean FC should do same but having an explicit opinion on whether it’s going to be in the protocol or clients would help (and can always change your mind late
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Don’t think they’re in competition. Uqbar smart contracts are native Hoon and so it’s exclusively focused on Urbit. Means it’s not one of those general-purpose potentially ‘cannibalistic’ L2’s (that certain ETH killer chains maintain are going to eat ETH)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
Thinks it’s really Urbit (Uqbar L2) + Ethereum
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
done. thnx!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
it's probably really easy to get a Poaster invite, right?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grgw pfp
grgw
@grgw
@perl
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction