Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
gm AMA — Farcaster, Warpcast, tech, etc.
53 replies
11 recasts
169 reactions
greyseymour.eth
@greyseymour
a little late here but - I’ve seen an uptick of Farcaster-friendly automation stuff - onchain-action-posting bots, mostly. What’s the FC policy on this sort of stuff? I think it’s awesome if contained but worry about an influx of such bots negatively affecting the signal:noise ratio that I love about FC.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Not sure I understand? Also it’s a permissionless protocol. There’s no policy. :)
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
greyseymour.eth
@greyseymour
- lotsa new posts by fully automated bots created by FC users - bots post based on onchain actions (eg “x user sold or bought y token”) - this is cool/good IMO but wonder if there might be a point where these bots create aggregate noise v signal & makes sense re permissionless lol - sry if q is odd/confusing :o
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
