Toni's conclusion

"Implementing anti-correlation penalties is a great way to counter economies of scale without requiring the protocol to differentiate between individual validators."

As a community, we'll never be able to save Ethereum from immature design, but we can buy time for researchers to harden the protocol.

I have mentioned before how one could correlate large clusters based on correlated missed attestations. It appears they're currently considering a mechanism similar to how gas prices are decided based on missed attestations. In other words, historcally correlated cluster information isn't considered, only last 4 blocks

Learn by doing, thats what I do best. Well, I learn by failing, but you fail by doing. I like to post my fails and learnings, so hopefully others can learn by m

Concern I have is that a large regional outage could cause negative impact to solostakers. We dont know how often that would happen, nor how bad the impact would be, but if a major weather or other event caused a mass regional outage, those solo stakers would be greatly impacted during an already high stress situation.

I feel like a similar risk exists for large corporate operators who run on AWS or other cloud providers. The goal isn't to spare home stakers from any penalty, only to make sure the incentives promote decentralization.