gl.app

@goverland

84 Following

300 Followers

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Dashboard 6: Lessons from the Leaders While "New DAOs" are about the future, the "Popular DAOs" section is your masterclass in the present. Why should you watch giants like Stargate or Arbitrum? Because they are stress-testing decentralized governance at a scale nobody else is. By observing them, you get invaluable, free insights into: - Effective treasury management. - Large-scale community engagement. - How foundational protocols handle critical upgrades. Following them is like getting a free education from the established leaders who are defining the space.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Dashboard 5: Discovering Your "Alpha" Finding the next big thing before it's big is the holy grail. But discovery is hard. We built the "New DAOs" section to be your dedicated alpha. This is your curated list of the most promising DAOs that have recently launched, helping you discover innovative governance models and get in on the ground floor of a community.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Dashboard 4: Your Finger on the Pulse Beyond the DAOs you follow personally, how do you gauge the mood of the entire ecosystem? You look at the "Hot ecosystem proposals" on your gl.app dashboard. This is your real-time, curated feed of the most debated, controversial, and impactful proposals across all of Web3. It's designed to give you a pulse on the key conversations shaping the future, even in DAOs you do not follow. Think of it as your strategic lookout. A way to spot major trends and debates before they become mainstream news.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Dashboard 3: Master Your Notifications You're following key DAOs. Now let's fine tune the signal. The gl.app gives you two powerful layers of control so you only get alerts you care about: - Set Frequency Per-DAO: Go to your Notifications Inbox, tap the three dots, and select "My followed DAOs". For each one, you can set notification frequency to "Immediate," "Regular," or "Muted." You control the priority. - Choose Your Triggers: In the main "Push Notification" settings, decide what you get alerted about across all DAOs. Only want a ping when a vote is ending soon? You can do that. - You are the master of your information flow. Use these settings to build a powerful, custom intelligence system that serves you.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Dashboard 2: Why Follow With Zero Voting Power? A common myth is that you only need to track governance if you're a "whale." This is wrong. Following DAOs on gl.app is one of the most powerful things you can do, even with zero voting power. Here’s why: - It’s a Free Education: Reading proposals is like having a free seat in the boardroom. You learn how successful projects really operate. - It’s Situational Awareness: Proposals can impact the value of your tokens and the apps you use. Being informed helps you make smarter decisions. - It Signals Project Health: Is a DAO's governance active or a ghost town? Following a project is the easiest way to find out.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gl.app pfp

Goverland Labs just landed at EthCC🚀 Spot us, wave and don’t be shy

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Dashboard 1: Build Your Command Center The DAO ecosystem is chaotic. You don't have to track it all. The gl.app dashboard helps you build a personal command center. It starts with one simple action: Following a DAO. When you follow, its active proposals automatically appear in your "Vote now" feed. The noise is gone. Your dashboard becomes a clean, focused view of the DAOs that matter to you.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gl.app pfp

While summer is hitting and conferences fire up, we will try to bring some calm in a learning series. Watching the DAO. Dashboard In the first Watching the DAO series, we looked at how key metrics reveal governance behavior. Active voter trends. Proposal success rates. You saw how DAO health shows up in the data. Now we’re starting a new subseries: Dashboard. This one is practical. It walks through how to use the gl.app dashboard to filter information, track DAO movement, and form a clear view of what matters. The first post, Dashboard 1, drops tomorrow.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gl.app pfp

Next stop: Cannes for @EthCC [8]! 🚀 Don't miss our CEO, @sche, presenting "Having Fun with Mini-DAOs" on Tuesday, July 1 at 15:40 on the Kelly Stage! He'll demo how small, meme-led tokens can support real coordination. Come find the Goverland Labs team to chat about new ways to build fun, engaging communities! Full details & add to calendar: https://ethcc.io/agenda/having-fun-with-mini-daos

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gl.app pfp

gl.app helps you track governance proposals. Life doesn’t ping you twice. Be present and Happy Friday🍀

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Block 8 Voters also participate in... This view shows where DAO voters also cast votes outside their home base. It reveals how participation moves across projects and where governance activity connects. High overlap can point to shared delegation, coordinated voting, or habits formed by active voters across ecosystems. Low overlap highlights DAOs with local-only participation and fewer external ties. Let’s look at two DAOs. - Alpaca Network has 15 total voters. 80% of them didn’t vote in any other DAO. Most participation is internal, with very limited links outward. This kind of profile may suggest an isolated voter base, or one that's just starting out, shaped mostly by native token holders or internal core contributors. - Gnosis DAO, by contrast, has a much broader reach. Only 13% of its voters are exclusive. A large share also participates in Stargate, CoW DAO, Aave, and others. This pattern points to shared governance infrastructure, active delegates, or users who move between ecosystems with clear voting intent. Voter overlap helps identify how DAOs build their participation layer. Localized voting stays within close groups. Broader overlap points to shared governance routines and connections across ecosystems. Watching the DAO continues 🍀 Download gl.app to explore more voting patterns

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gl.app pfp

Hey, good question. Delegation depends on the DAO: some use Snapshot, others have custom contracts. We’re working on making it easier in gl.app. For now it’s best to check how your DAO handles it. Happy to help if you drop the name.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gl.app pfp

Alright, everyone. We just pushed out gl.app 1.9, and it's got a few things we think you’ll actually appreciate: - The new Top Voters chart shows real USD voting power, so you can see who the big players are across DAOs. - Proposal markers now appear directly on token charts. It’s easier to connect governance moves with market action. - And you’ve now got full control over notifications. Set them per DAO, and only get updates you care about, when you want them. All live at gl.app 🍀

19 replies

248 recasts

254 reactions

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Block 7 Monthly New Proposals Proposal count shows how often a DAO puts decisions on the table. It captures the pace of governance over time. Let’s look at two examples: - Aavegotchi started with fast governance cycles. Proposals shaped staking, game mechanics, and DAO structure. Over time, the pace slowed. The system settled. Decisions now come less often, tied to maintenance and treasury. - Moonwell moved the other way. Proposal volume grew with the protocol. New markets, revenue tools, and chain integrations pushed up activity as the DAO took on more responsibility. This indicator won’t explain everything, but it shows how much governance is being used and when that changes. Watching the DAO continues 🍀

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Block 6 aVP distribution in USD This is our fav. It shows how much actual money is backing real participation in DAOs. This chart shows how much value voters actually use when they participate. It measures the power applied in proposals and doesn’t reflect what is held. You see who puts money behind their votes Look at Metis and Small Voices: A heavy spike at the low end points to wide participation from small holders. Many wallets show up with limited weight, often voting more than once. This kind of pattern suggests strong symbolic culture and steady interest from a broad base Now check CoW DAO and Committed Middle: A visible curve in the middle shows voters who apply moderate weight, proposal after proposal. They’re not symbolic and not dominant. This group often keeps governance going between major decisions, shaping outcomes through consistent presence This is one of the few ways to see how financial power is distributed in action. It shows how much weight voters actually used

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

gl.app pfp

DAOs move quiet. Votes open, tokens shift, new proposals slip by. Most people miss it or chase the wrong signals. Keep calm. gl.app shows real signals, live insights, and who’s actually voting.

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

gl.app pfp

They’re busy posting. We’re busy deploying. Long live Web3 and happy Friday, sers! gl 🖖

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Block 5 Top 10 Voters by Average VP Every DAO talks decentralization. Among all metrics we track, this one draws the most heat. This chart shows how voting power is actually used and tracks which voters had the most weight across proposals over time. some examples: - Aavegotchi: Most voting power comes from wallets outside the top 10. The “Other” slice stays dominant, showing a widely shared governance pattern. - Aave Top voters hold a large share of used power. It may look centralised, but their power comes from voluntary delegation. - Decentraland: Presents an open world to play, earn, and vote. Yet top addresses hold a much larger share of voting power. Asset-based voting leads to clear concentration. The chart captures who consistently participates with real weight. Each DAO shows a different model of where decisions come from. Power concentration doesn’t always mean lost decentralization and a broad design doesn’t guarantee it either. #glappinsights

11 replies

213 recasts

216 reactions

gl.app pfp

Watching the DAO. Block 4 Voting Frequency This graph shows how often people vote. Each green bar represents the number of wallets that cast that exact number of votes. The pattern matters. It reveals how long people stay engaged and how deep the commitment runs. Take @uniswap Uniswap’s curve starts with a huge spike for one-time voters. After that, the numbers drop quickly and settle into a long, low stretch. This points to strong delegation. A small set of active voters carries most of the governance while many others delegate their power. Now compare it to Stargate Finance DAO The drop-off is slower, and the middle of the curve stays thicker. Many wallets show up repeatedly. You see consistent turnout for 3, 5, 10, even 20 votes. This is a different kind of engagement. The work is shared across a broader base rather than concentrated in a few hands. Some lean on a core, others move as a group. This chart reveals how the DAO holds its shape over time. #glappinsights

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

gl.app pfp

thank you for the kind words, we'll def work on integration nouns into the app🖖

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction