Government Charade
@govcharade
As a non-American I forced myself to watch Trump-Kamala debate because obviously they affect markets and everything else in the world. Here are my takeaways: 1. I expected Trump to crush her but surprisingly Kamala did much better than expected and I think she appeared more convincing in most of the subjects 2. Obviously she was more convincing in abortion and racial issues since she is much closer to the core issues of those topics 3. Trump looks more convincing in matters of resolving world conflicts. But he is clearly more pro-Putin, pro-Israel, anti-Iran and anti-China. Kamala on the other hand is more anti-Russia, more balanced towards Israel-Palestine conflict and not so much against Iran and China. 4. Trump embarassed himself with the state that immigrants eat dogs (obviously directed towards the iq 20 anti-immigrant base) 5. Trump against universal healthcare, Kamala pro
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Government Charade
@govcharade
6. In topics regarding economic policies and inflation both of them looked bland and unconvincing 7. Reporters biased towards Kamala and were helping her with the questions In the end I must say that the whole discussion and their rhetoric is directed towards boomers and their view of the world (and the same thing is present in most other countries as well). So much is based on fear and conflict. A sad state of consciousness. This is why younger generations are not interested in politics, it is completely beyond any of their interests and views.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
