gilles pfp
gilles
@gilles
NFTs, explained [Banana Edition] mint [at] /vv link + provenance ↓
1 reply
6 recasts
10 reactions

gilles pfp
gilles
@gilles
24h https://gillesdc.worldcomputer.art/0x2fbc797edcf6763e47aefa92e8666e3a2da22ae9/1
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

gilles pfp
gilles
@gilles
1/ Art Basel 2019, Miami Maurizio Cattelan duct-tapes a banana to a wall, declares it "art" and sells two editions for $120k each the banana, bought for 30 cents at a local grocery store, was eaten shortly ("delicious" ) but the collector doesn't care
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

gilles pfp
gilles
@gilles
2/ the collector doesn't care because the art was not to be found in its material instance but somewhere else where is the art, then? in the concept? in the moment of creation? in the expression of zeitgeist?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

gilles pfp
gilles
@gilles
3/ regardless, no one thinks a banana is a work of art, no more than a random canvas hanging in the Louvre is the Mona Lisa important is the distinction between physical instance and original idea inspiring it — instances can be infinite ∞ vs. the concept is 1-1
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

gilles pfp
gilles
@gilles
4/ who knows how many people taped fruit to a wall before Catellan nobody thought that concept was "art" until the moment he did and sold it as "art" as gallery owner Emmanuel Perrotin put it: "if you don't sell the work as a work of art, it's not a work of art"
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

gilles pfp
gilles
@gilles
5/ ever since, anyone who duct-tapes fruit to a wall today and inevitably evokes Cattelan; meaning so or not all re-enactments, replicas and derivatives lead back to the original moment in time and its concept; in fact accruing its value (also known as "cultural capital")
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction