Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
AA experts: ~6 months ago, it was my understanding that passkey wallets weren’t viable because they use cryptography that is too expensive to verify onchain (hence EIP 7212 etc). But now everyone is making them. What changed? 🤔
7 replies
7 recasts
86 reactions

itai (building dynamic.xyz) pfp
itai (building dynamic.xyz)
@itai
A few things IMO: 1. low gas cost chains like Base (and gas sponsorships) 2. EIP 7212 native implementation going live in multiple chains, lowering costs significantly 3. End users are getting more used to the concept of passkeys, which was also a blocker before
3 replies
1 recast
16 reactions

GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
Got it - so the verification cost hasn’t changed but it’s small enough on L2 and will be much smaller with 7212?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

itai (building dynamic.xyz) pfp
itai (building dynamic.xyz)
@itai
That's right. There still is a cost. It's just smaller and getting even smaller. Also with 4337 you get counterfactual addresses, so you defer the first contract deployment cost until first transaction, not during wallet creation.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions