anon
@superanon
Founders who are leaving ETH for Solana or other new ecosystems are not the smartest.
13 replies
19 recasts
238 reactions
Daniel - Bountycaster
@pirosb3
I generally don't fully understand why this would happen (in either direction). It's like saying you are leaving Python for Rust. Short term, I understand how the switch in either direction would provide hype and marketing push. Long term, what counts is the product (did you build something people care about?) the chain is/will be abstracted.
3 replies
1 recast
18 reactions
GIG☀️
@gig
Imo it’s more like setting up shop in a new small town in the middle of nowhere, disconnected from everything else and speaking a different language While EVM ecosystem is this massive city, connected to other cities with a great transport system, everybody speaks the same language, the law is the same etc
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Grit, إنشاءالله.eth
@grit
Why does Solana have so much volume then?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
GIG☀️
@gig
Volume only says so much Solana might be a good place to trade More tx per block, almost no cost etc so if you want to be fast, it offers advantages in that aspect But in terms of actually building something it falls short of eth in many ways. The proven security of eth, the massive existing infrastructure provided by years of people building various things the ease of all the chains having the same coding language, which also allows us to learn from the thousands of past exploits The ability to make what you build multichain over all the EVM compatible chains without having do create 2 versions As we have many times seen when sol gets real giga traffic during day airdrop claims, the network is barely usable for hours. If you have built something there this can be very problematic for your users Most important to compare is the amount of volume being spent on making use of various dapps and the growth of dapps On the network
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
