No matter how good of a project you're holding, if team says one of these: 

"we prefer to let the product for itself"

"we want to do things differently and build heads down"

"Price is of no matter to us"

Dump ASAP unless you want to spend the bull in no-name town with them

CEO at @phaverapp, the gateway to Web3 social and largest app on Lens Protocol, now also on Farcaster

In crypto since 2016 | Nature Photograpy | Experimental art using creative coding | Don't take my casts to serious

Exactly.
I’ve seen this shit happen so many times. I’m not moved again. I just degen and mind my business.

Tag @joonatan.eth to this and they’ll call it Fud 😂🤷🏽‍♂️

Crypto enthusiast and a Web3 lover

/masks 

Nah this isn’t about phaver, phaver is doing plenty of things marketing wise, it’s about projects who think they won’t have to do any marketing to attract users of their product

We’re simply not deep into bull market territory enough yet for people to go for the new and risky picks 

Right now there are still so many projects who have a track record of a few years at dumpster prizes that people go for the obvious picks first

Then as people take profit, and want to reinvest in something that hasn’t pumped yet, then the money moves to the new and obscure stuff

Nah, maybe for you. But right now I’m talking about $SOCIAL 
And yeah I agree Phaver is cool and innovative but the token is not even close. $SOCIAL is showing no signs of life at the moment man. The only people that’s engaging with that token are the people here if we’re to be honest to ourselves.