Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
pretty cool that the election has spurred my /all-in groupchat to talk more about blockchain — first w/ @polymarket and now w/ voting: "can someone steelman why voting should not be done via blockchain?" the answers are switching costs, implementation, security, etc. someone said privacy to which zk was the reply.
10 replies
0 recast
32 reactions
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
doesn't answer the question but pretty much I keep circling back to "People in power don't like changes to how to get there" It's my default answer to all sorts of questions - Why not making voting more representative? - Why not vote for ideas instead of people? - Why not have more transparent [voting|spending|lobbying] - Why not have doers/builders as politicians instead of talkers? - Why disqualify purple cats in gentleman tophats?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
gFam.live (UrbanGladiator)
@gfam
I've thought about these questions a lot... and I think part of the problem is there is just so much information... I can't be an expert on healthcare and infrastructure and foreign affairs and climate... so ideally I'd get representatives who organize the doers. I really like the concept of voting for ideas, but I'm just not sure enough people who understand the complexities/nuances of what they'd be voting for.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
