I've seen a lot of debate about whether Kamala Harris should go on the Joe Rogan Experience and here's my take:

- 95-97% of US voters have already decided who they are voting for.
- Polls show a very tight race at essentially 50/50.
- Young men are statistically the most likely group to blow off voting.
- 7 swing states hold the keys to the presidency.

With 10 days to go, the Harris campaign has to make every moment count.  Do they spend time on trying to reach 3-5M undecided Rogan listeners nationally, or do they spend that time trying to specifically target the 3M undecided voters in those swing states?

Rogan is a kind, non-combative conversationalist, I think they'd have a good time and I think its a good idea... but I also understand that it might not necessarily be the best use of time to target the specific people the campaigns need to target.

Web monetization.  Working on gfam.live to help creators earn from their content.

I think she's a competent politician who can be both tough or kind depending on the situation. I think her pledge to build 3 million homes in the US is extremely important and I like the idea of the First Home buyers grant. 

I'm extremely impressed she was able to galvanize the entire Democratic party when Biden stepped down... it could have been an absolute mess of infighting and it just... wasn't.

Her campaign staff have been phenomenal considering their gains on Trump who has effectively been holding rallies for a couple of years. I don't think people super appreciate how big a job they had ahead of them.

I definitely don't agree with all of her positions but I think directionally she's on the right track.

You didn't ask, but I quite like Tim Walz - he just seems like a nice guy who wants to help people.

Honestly, I don't think you're going to like my answer... but I don't have a super strong opinion on it because I wasn't in California while she was the DA so I don't really know all the context or situation at the time.

Some say she was too lenient, some say she was too tough, some say she was a reformer and some don't like that she was against the death penalty. 

Personally I like that she tried different programs to try and prevent crime altogether, even if sometimes they backfired (like the anti-truancy program that targeted the parents).  I also like that she seems to have grown. She now says that she wants to legalize weed when in the past she came down pretty heavy on weed offenses. 

For elections in general I do think policy positions are the most important thing. People should vote on what policies they want for their country more than the personality of the candidate.... and then hold those candidates to those promises if elected.

That's a very good explanation. How do you feel about her prosecutorial record?