Geoff Golberg pfp
Geoff Golberg
@geoffgolberg
The cognitive dissonance is strong here.. MM continually asserts that increasing the supply of content is of grave importance, yet does absolutely nothing to attract new users/content creators (And attracting new users doesn't require marketing!)
10 replies
2 recasts
16 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
> yet does absolutely nothing to attract new users/content creators how do you know what we are or are not doing?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Geoff Golberg pfp
Geoff Golberg
@geoffgolberg
Based on what I (and others) can see What efforts have been made by MM to attract new users/content creators? (please note this is different than efforts focused on retaining current users)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I spend most of my day talking to current and potential users to try to understand pain points. And then solve those through product. :) So by definition you're not going to see that work.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Geoff Golberg pfp
Geoff Golberg
@geoffgolberg
I am not asking about the internal process, Dan (though I commend the time you spend speaking with users, both current and potential!) Your discovery process aside, I am asking about tangible things you can point to where MM has made efforts/committed resources to attracting new users/content creators
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Founder time is a significant commitment of resources. We're in discovery mode, so any formal program or process is unlikely to be high ROI.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Geoff Golberg pfp
Geoff Golberg
@geoffgolberg
If you're game, I would love to discuss further with you via Tavern at some point Startups are about testing things out, not making assumptions (e.g. "unlikely to be high ROI") My opinion, at least
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Polite decline for now.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions