Engagement from these 30 accounts are most valuable re: making it rain Moxie..

For comparison, here are Far Scores (and Far Ranks!) from a sampling of other users to benchmark against the top 30:

- @adrienne (81.87; Far Rank = 103)
- @christin (29.84; Far Rank = 188)
- @proxystudio.eth (10.11; Far Rank = 325)
- @maretus.eth (7.94; Far Rank = 341)
- @mazmhussain (2.02; Far Rank = 559)
- @geoffgolberg (0.83; Far Rank = 911)

What does this mean?

It means engagement from @jessepollak is 357 times more valuable than engagement from @mazmhussain

It means engagement from @linda is 55 times more valuable than engagement from @proxystudio.eth 

There are fewer than 1,000 accounts that have a Far Score greater than 1

Make of it what you will..

Which of you Moxie fairies would be so kind as to help me crack 200K with a recast?

Which of you Moxie fairies would be so kind as to help me crack 200K with a recast? https://warpcast.com/geoffgolberg/0x4781f54f

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

Building products onchain 🌐 | magma Fellow | Kernel Fellow

Digital panhandling in the feed via root casts is fair game.. just not in replies!

Seems you need to re-read @dwr.eth's casts from earlier today :)

There are black-and-white cases of spam.. those are the ones Dan has in mind imo

Not the grey (subjective) ones!

fair play. but also shows why spam is subjective. casts in feed still take up attention similar to casts in replies