gatedude.eth on Warpcast

Content pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Samuel pfp

@samuellhuber.eth

20 USDC bounty for the fastest way to turn styled html (HTML + CSS including potential <image> tags layered etc) into an image (filetype image). reply with the fastest way, provide benchmarks why it's the fastest. No language restriction, can be any code with an open and permissive license. Provide examples proving your point that 1) the library works 2) it can be used and is blazingly fast @bountybot deadline 7 days.

13 replies

3 recasts

11 reactions

gatedude.eth pfp

Hey fam, If you want to convert styled HTML (including CSS and images) to an image quickly and efficiently, you should use Puppeteer with Node.js. Puppeteer is actually a headless browser library for Node and yeah it can render HTML/CSS accurately and even save it as an image file. Here's a code Example using Puppeteer (Node.js) const puppeteer = require('puppeteer'); const fs = require('fs'); (async () => { const browser = await puppeteer.launch(); const page = await browser.newPage(); // Load HTML content const htmlContent = ` <html> <head> <style> /* Your CSS here */ </style> </head> <body>  </body> </html> `; await page.setContent(htmlContent); // Set viewport for full content rendering await page.setViewport({ width: 800, height: 600 }); // Save as image await page.screenshot({ path: 'output.png', fullPage: true }); await browser.close(); })();

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gatedude.eth pfp

Also, puppeteer is awesome cause it has headless Chromium Rendering and leverages a headless version of Chromium, optimized for speed and performance. Also It can handle rendering and image capture asynchronously, and it's fast but usually very fast on system with modern CPU Actually I'm more impressed how Puppeteer works directly with the browser’s rendering engine, cause it ensures accurate and quick CSS and HTML parsing. Benchmarks: Puppeteer is known to be faster than many server-side rendering engines (like wkhtmltoimage) due to its modern JavaScript engine and optimizations for Chromium. Puppeteer is licensed and released under the Apache 2.0 license, so yeah it's open and permissive for use. The rest result of Puppeteer is that it maintains CSS accuracy, especially with complex layouts and animations. And I love it's speed too, cause it renders a page to an image takes under a second, even with layered elements and complex styles.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Samuel pfp

@samuellhuber.eth

wha'ts the speed of this solution? how fast is it?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gatedude.eth pfp

Yes it's fast; like for simple HTML content (basic text and minimal CSS), Puppeteer typically takes 50-100 milliseconds to render and capture an image while for moderately complex content (CSS styling, embedded images), the rendering time ranges between 100-200 milliseconds. Also, very complex HTML pages (animations, JavaScript, layered images), can take between 200-500 milliseconds or slightly more, depending on the CPU and the available system resources. Also, like I mentioned in my previous comment, it's fast because Puppeteer interacts directly with the Chromium engine, which is optimized for fast web rendering. The Chromium browser headless mode significantly reduces startup time, allowing Puppeteer to load and render content quickly. If you're Running Puppeteer on a system with an average CPU like Intel i5 or equivalent, it takes 60ms for Simple HTML while 150ms for moderate HTML with CSS/images, & 350ms for complex HTML/CSS + JS animations.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

gatedude.eth pfp

But if you're using wkhtmltoimage (Command-Line Tool), it takes approximately 100-150 milliseconds for basic HTML with minimal styling while pages with more complex CSS and embedded images, the time may go up to 200-300 milliseconds. But for very complex pages with lots of styles, images, or complex layouts, it can range from 300-600 milliseconds. Also, wkhtmltoimage is fast cause it's optimized for fast, headless rendering with the WebKit engine, which processes HTML and CSS quickly without a full browser and running as a command-line tool reduces the overhead compared to browser-based solutions. If you're On a server-grade or average desktop CPU it takes 120ms for Basic HTML, 250ms for moderate HTML with CSS/images while 500ms for Complex HTML with animations.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction