DeFi

It might be time @sumaa 

https://x.com/euler__lagrange/status/1851658258886386104?s=46

I’ll say it louder for the people in the back - DYDX HAS SHIT MATCHING GUARANTEES

If you think I’m wrong come debate me on it

Ok, I want to argue.

Do you prefer Decentralization or you love being centralized!

Also, how does dYdX's current system handle order priority in practice? Speaking of transparency, everyone loves one but dyxd offer less immediate transparency in their order matching.

This is just the tip of the iceberg

I'm turned off sumaa; everyone loves transparency and everything should be verifiable Onchain. 

Would you give me a dollar without telling you what I intend to use it for? If I just tell you to give me the dollar, and not worry about the use, would you give me? No, of course you wouldn't! Transparency is everything; and decentralization is awesome!

Since there's no transparency, orders could be matched wrongly, potentially manipulated, or even delayed. This is bad for web3.

Also, how does dYdX compare to other DeFi platforms in terms of matching guarantees?

You said it; so you're a decentralization maxi and you use centralized? You're like a teacher telling it's students to read a textbook without knowing the contents of the textbook.

There are way better options than Dydx; and decentralization platforms at that. You're like a kid telling everyone how awesome a tennis ball is when you haven't seen a "Football" or a "Basketball."

I think it's better (as the kid by the beach) to just sit down and wait until Dydx full transitioning. Then you can Boast how cool your tennis ball is becoming something else.

im a decentralization maxi. Dydx handles order priority fully authoritarian - the block proposer gets full control of the order (much like other chains). In terms of transparency, there is none. All matching happens off-chain and it's not possible to achieve consensus on the matching guarantees other than a very dysfunctional "social consensus" layer