Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Coop pfp
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
One of the hardest parts of running an onchain distribution business is that everyone is competing against one another to capture a platform or referral fee instead of working together to maximize the success of a mint. The focus is on getting someone to mint on your front-end vs there being incentives that reward impact on a mint as a whole. Big opportunity to flip the design space away from front-end mint fee to rewarding impact on a viral mint and who provided the most volume. Theoretically - the bigger the mint, the more all parties should be rewarded for their contributions in making that market successful.
5 replies
2 recasts
19 reactions

Garrett  pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Wouldn't you still track impact of a viral mint and who provided the most volume via a front end or a referral link? How else would you track this impact or volume?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Coop pfp
Coop
@coopahtroopa.eth
There needs to be added rewards and economics for total volume driven - most of these platforms optimize for single mints. There's no difference for referring a mint to a collection with 1 mint vs a collection with 10000 mints. To most platforms a mint is the same across the board and I think this is wrong.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction