Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
gm
8 replies
1 recast
15 reactions
Sam Iglesias
@sam
a worm could have made that pattern
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
fz3n
@fz3n
Then it is neither a 6 or a 9, it is worm pattern.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sam Iglesias
@sam
the correct answer (I think): 1) the intention of making the mark is a factual question (could have been intended as either or nothing at all) 2) what the mark can be interpreted as can be either 6, 9, (or something else) but we have social conventions around appealing to intention, 1, to settle it
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
fz3n
@fz3n
Symbols exist to communicate ideas, and the communicator of the idea is the creator. That's why we care about intent. '6' and '9' are ideas larger than their arabic numerals. Focusing on intent is a key underpinning to how communication works at all. Or a worm did it, and it means the worm crawled that way.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sam Iglesias
@sam
My point is a little more subtle. I claim that symbols can be assigned interpretations. They donβt have meaning intrinsically. What the intent of a mark is is a related but separate point.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction