Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Amadon
@amadon.eth
Signal isn’t secure. Telegram isn’t secure. We can’t communicate privately and that’s a problem.
17 replies
0 recast
19 reactions
Tiv
@tiv
Signal not being secure is FUD to drive people to use other things that are actually not secure
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
FtrSaroth
@ftrsaroth
Some years ago i was involved as a community member on a project focused on privacy, HUSH, something i remember i read on that time about signal <<Signal requires phone numbers and is a centralized service. HushChat is completely anonymous and decentralized and requires absolutely no metadata be given to any centralized third parties. Signal is also not fully open source, the backend servers are NOT OPEN SOURCE, and so, Signal should be considered "open core" and not fully open source. HushChat is Free Software! We are about your freedom, Moxie cares about his Silicon Valley friends>>
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Tiv
@tiv
End to end encryption is end to end encryption and burner numbers are easy enough to come by. I don’t have concerns anyone but myself and the recipient can read my signal messages barring our phones themselves being compromised. I’ve spent enough time with Moxie in casual circumstances I trust his character. Hush sounds cool I’m always happy to see more options as long as people implement them correctly (which is the biggest problem we see with any security stuff)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction