Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Haardik
@haardikkk
AMMs: - better UI/UX - largest trading volume - available everywhere - actually decentralized - nicely composable - crypto native - not wintermute why do you think CLOBs are still better?
10 replies
2 recasts
15 reactions
Jorge Schnura
@schnura
Liquidity efficiency
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Haardik
@haardikkk
what do you mean?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Flydexo
@flydexo.eth
CLOB requires less capital in the book for the same volume of exchange compared to AMMs, but AMMs are still a great invention for newer markets
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Haardik
@haardikkk
Genuinely out of good faith - I don’t see how? Can you illustrate with an example?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Flydexo
@flydexo.eth
for Uni V2, the LP capital is spread across the whole price range 0 to +inf, this is highly reduced with V3 but not as optimal as the granularity that CLOB offers
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Haardik
@haardikkk
v2 style AMMs are definitely not the comparison to make here hahah v3/v4 have a lot more granularity. And on chains other than ETH L1, many implementations can have even more granularity thanks to the cheaper gas costs
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
