Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan Shea — e/acc
@ryanshea.eth
Some have asked about e/acc vs d/acc & so I feel I should say a few words about it: d/acc is cool, and a noble effort, but as defined, it shouldn’t be considered an offshoot of e/acc but antithetical to it & closer to EA. Why? It emphasizes we should be “uniquely careful” with AI, which violates the basic tenet.
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
ferostabio.eth
@ferostabio
I feel d/acc was a missed opportunity. Instead of aligning and doing a fork with a focus on decentralization, it raised alarms about safety. It makes sense, I guess, in the current ecosystem, where an ETF and compliance are more important than privacy and anonimity.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ryan Shea — e/acc
@ryanshea.eth
Yeah it was so close to being a rallying cry that would extend the excitement behind e/acc. Instead, it tried to Trojan Horse the concept of decentralized accelerationism with a big dose of safetyism.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
