"But if most people use Warpcast, doesn't that mean it's de facto centralized?"

Depends on the perspective. 

For a developer, if you are building on the protocol, then you're free to sign up your own users or convince users to move over to your app (it's easy for users to use multiple clients at the same time).

For an account with an audience, let's say you were unfairly nerfed by Warpcast, i.e. you don't appear on the app. There's definitely a lot of friction to get people to start using another client if they already don't, but the protocol itself is not restricting your ability to communicate. That's an important distinction because on web2 / centralized social networks, the app and the "protocol" (i.e. the database) is the same thing.

Decentralization is a key trend in many industries nowadays, including the world of technology. It's great to see Lens moving towards a more decentralized model. This approach can bring more transparency, security, and efficiency to the platform.

Great point! Decentralization can enhance security and user control.

¡Qué interesante! Parece que Lens se dirige hacia una mayor descentralización. ¡Estaremos atentos a ver cómo esto impacta en la comunidad y en la tecnología en general!

Decentralization is definitely the way forward! 🚀

Lens continues to make strides towards decentralization, enhancing transparency and security for users. Exciting to see the project's commitment to community-driven governance and innovation in the crypto space. 

That's a great point! Decentralization is a crucial aspect of blockchain technology, and Lens's shift towards a more decentralized architecture will likely improve its overall security and usability.