Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jw 🦺 ERC6551 pfp
jw 🦺 ERC6551
@0xjw.eth
Is anyone working on zk-based consensus? Intuitively it seems like you could replace zk-unfriendly signatures in consensus algorithms with (recursive) proofs of pubkey = hash(privatekey, data) using a zk-friendly hash, which would enable much cheaper / faster proofs.
3 replies
1 recast
1 reaction

Emre Tekisalp pfp
Emre Tekisalp
@etekis
minaprotocol.com
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jw 🦺 ERC6551 pfp
jw 🦺 ERC6551
@0xjw.eth
Mina is the closest I've seen to this. Doesn't it use a curve-based signature scheme for accounts though? I'm wondering if replacing curve-based signature verification with hash-based proof verification might result in simpler / cheaper / faster proofs.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction