I've thought a lot about AI art and whether or not we should think about it as art. You can read all about it in this article. From the article title you can probably guess where I fall on this topic.

I've thought a lot about AI art and whether or not we should think about it as art. You can read all about it in this article. From the article title you can probably guess where I fall on this topic.
https://www.fxhash.xyz/article/in-defense-of-ai-art

i loved this paragraph btw. quick feedback: please put this into paragraph frames so people can read inline, or share a specific quote you want people to engage with.

other than that, would love to know the framework @emodi, @sanjay, @0xen, and @bchow use to consider AI or generative art as "art"

icebreaker.xyz/0xen |
https://gallery.so/Oxen/galleries | https://opensea.io/collection/farcats

Generative artist | Making /farpolitic + /ansible | Software Engineer @ Warbler Labs contributing to Goldfinch | https://www.chowbrandon.com/ 


Computational biologist, data scientist, digital artist | 
https://clauswilke.art/links | Hosting /ai-art & /clauswilke

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

One of the things that motivates Highlight is the potential to expand and decentralize the definition of Art 

That said, what makes art Art is usually a combination of strong skill (often technical), aesthetics (beautiful, challenging, etc), and concept

If you think about those three lenses you can start to delineate