Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Elie
@elie
So many startups I speak to are spending $1k+ per month on servers with way less traffic. They also spent hours on DevOps which easily costs them tens of thousands in salaries. $200 is an annoying amount to spend if you're a student / have no revenue. But all things considered this is a tiny bill for 30k users, esp. considering he likely spent 0 time/money on DevOps other than this bill because Vercel makes things so easy. Plus his site didn't crash because Vercel scales automatically. Obviously, you can get cheaper prices (esp. if you don't value your time), as Vercel charges a markup. And that might be the best thing for him. Spending $2.5k per year on servers is tough when getting started. https://x.com/rexan_wong/status/1855760594403799132
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Royal
@royalaid.eth
Great breakdown from Theo where a lot of the "unexpected" costs of Vercel come from. https://youtu.be/jsuNjCAngnQ Unsurprisingly its CDN and bandwidth from assets and serverless execution with needless awaiting.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
W1NTΞR
@w1nt3r
Pricing aside, he'll learn a lot more going self-hosted route. Vercel is great when it's your deliberate choice and you ran some bill estimations.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nicholas Charriere
@pushix
+1, Vercel is expensive and that's a good debate to have, but "surprise bills" are not a valid criticism.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction