Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

six pfp
six
@six
The whole point of Nouns (imo) is to run an experiment in continuous, permissionless capital formation and distribution. I know the Foundation is thinking about this deeply but I hope that there is an alternative path that doesn’t require KYC for recipients. It breaks the hyperstructure and makes the experiment much less interesting.
6 replies
2 recasts
29 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
If this is the only option to keep Nouns “alive” in the face of the regulatory environment then I get it. Most if not all recipients incl. myself would happily KYC. Just ideologically it’s not as cool
2 replies
0 recast
14 reactions

Elad pfp
Elad
@el4d
We agree in spirit; to the best of my understanding we have to do this..
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Bixbite 👽  pfp
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
Do we though? Says who? Wasn’t the idea of the Duna just recently brought to the Foundation and discussed? …. Is the option transfer to a Duna orrrrr Nouns gets shut down? It’s supposed to be a permissionless protocol: remove the Nounder reward, fork & veto and let the experiment continue to run. …. Or why wouldn’t we look to other organizations such as the Ethereum foundation which is a Swiss Non-profit. Why not model after them? …. Solana is also a Swiss Non-profit.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions