Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan J. Shaw
@rjs
At last the debate arrives at our hidden presuppositions! @vijay believes that a 70% cashback parameter will promote more participation in AF than an e.g. 30% cashback parameter, and therefore will produce more revenue overall for *some* channels. I believe the number of subscribers in my channel is a result of *my* hard work, not $ALFA games. I don't need the gamification - my game is delivering cold, hard content 👊 So this is why I'm annoyed that my work is being potentially discounted down 70%, and why @vijay is annoyed *his* work to build an active subscriber base is being discounted by me in turn. Specifically, the 70% parameter would need to consistently bring in 2.6x more subscribers with the e.g. 30% parameter for @vijay's argument to hold. Who's correct? I think he and I are on the same page here -- it needs to be a configurable parameter which each channel can play with and discover what works best for themselves.
12 replies
3 recasts
25 reactions
eirrann | he/him🎩🔵
@eirrann.eth
Excellent topic of debate. Here's another question: to what extent is this immaterial if prominent creators and subscribers alike are losing interest/belief in the platform en masse? Can Vijay and team turn the ship around? I hope so, and am betting yes with my continued presence and focus on building my channel. What will it take to restore interest amid the fickle market of web3?
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
