Ed pfp

Ed

@eds

205 Following
241 Followers
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Done. Nice job this week
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Surprisingly, Democrats do pretty well among boomers in some states.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Public opinion is turning against fully commercialized recreational weed. Cities reek of marijuana, and it doesn't help with crime or traffic accidents.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
X/Twitter today be like: "I'm a trad Christian mother of 5 and I voted for Kamala" and "I'm a gay socialist Iranian immigrant and I voted for Trump"
1 reply
1 recast
9 reactions
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Yes plz
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Wow!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Macroeconomists are scared to death of deflation and will fire up the money printer again to avoid it, as they have done in the past
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Yeah, but the problem there wasn't the size of the storm but a whole series of failures including the levy breaking. Hoping Milton will not be as bad.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Maple Pass in the North Cascades/Washington.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
You want a national holiday to put a ballot in the mailbox? Very few countries have no-excuse mail-in voting like we do.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
lfg
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
He had about 60% of the primary locked in in 2024. If he loses, I could see his primary base decline to about 40% leaving an opening for someone else.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
I don't know if he considers himself marxist but @tayzonday
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Hating this too. This plan is also dumb and myopic
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
It's California, there is only one party
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Ran it in 2022 and hope to again in the future
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
I know. I'm not saying he didn't have a machine gun in 2002, I was just responding to the reply that said mentally ill have "easy access to machine guns"
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
They won't cut by 0.75% (consensus is 25-50 and I'd guess 25), and this letter will have no impact on that
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Serious answer, because then they couldn't be made waterproof.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed pfp
Ed
@eds
Machine guns are illegal and extremely hard to access
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction