Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
Help us Review https://github.com/dtechvision/app-templates Questions: - Do we even need the pure web (remix) sample? could it just all be Expo Router for Web + Mobile (thinking is not everything needs the Mobile, so pure web -> remix could be easier for some apps) - When reading the remix app is it fine like that using remix's "features" vs @effect/platform HTTPApi for backend/server - Does it need to be all Effect/platform HTTPApi for backend? Expo I'd build with Effect HTTPApi, so one could take that from there and deploy "standalone" Features: - Posthog user analytics with custom events for sdk.context so we know where each frame user is coming from and run analytics for sure (use backend proxy, so adblocks don't filter it all) - Frame notifications backend so webhook gets stored into DB and we can send notifications to users - Cloudflare Pages easy deploy Github Action + Gitlab CI for master branch If I find the review valuable I'll reward 10 USDC @bountybot
7 replies
4 recasts
21 reactions

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
on the first part expo router is solid enough that you can prolly do it all there now, will look a bit into the rest later!
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
yep I am actively pondering if it's even valuable to have another option, though I believe remix + expo as the only two should be fine, happy to be convinced otherwise. I truly believe these app-templates will be the default for most FC Frames / Apps built going forward as 1) we'll use them internally in dTech 2) lots of devs use templates and it would be the best one :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction