Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
I am sorry Composer actions should be composer plugins And mini apps should stay mini apps We need a dedicated term for a mini app that is invoked when creating a cast and helping or to create a cast
8 replies
1 recast
25 reactions

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
Composer extensions also work @matthewfox Pick one
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
The way I view it is that mini apps themselves will just have different entry & exit points, espc exit points eg. with the same mini app you’ll have a full mini app *and* can still post composer action/like events(such as populating the cast composer with text and embeds)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
1000% though how we communicate to everyone so it becomes clear and they know what to ask devs for and come up with crazy cool ideas ?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
while I totally agree that language itself means a lot, I think it’s also hard to throw so many terms out there when the specs are constantly changing I’d view them as mini apps and those mini apps can have properties including the point of entry, point of exit, category, etc and I think if there’s one common name it’s a bit easier to say “hey look at this thing & all the stuff you can do with it”
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
Spec changes idea doesn’t 😃
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction