Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Assume Moore's Law equivalent for: 1. LLM quality 2. Text to video generation quality 3. Apple VR headset resolution / fidelity Seems like infinite content universes eat 80-90% of existing media content consumption?
4 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I don't think infinite content universes work for sports β€”Β what makes it interesting is Lindy gladiatorial element + random number generator within a set of conditions.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

borodutch πŸ‘ˆπŸ‘ˆπŸ˜ŽπŸ‘–πŸ’¨ pfp
borodutch πŸ‘ˆπŸ‘ˆπŸ˜ŽπŸ‘–πŸ’¨
@farcasteradmin.eth
@balajis.eth had an interesting thought about how in not-so-distant future it will be faster and cheaper to generate the content locally rather than download it from cloud
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Yash Karthik pfp
Yash Karthik
@yashkarthik
1. a cambrian explosion of home-made, but almost-pro quality => faster; it's already high now with youtube, but now it'll be ever quicker to convert you idea to video / blob 2. an echo chamber of ideas you "love" => greater divisiveness
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Simon de la Rouviere pfp
Simon de la Rouviere
@simondlr
We already at the infinite. What matters more is what can be shared. The infinitely lonely won't be enticing over the shared. Tangentially, it means more and more that intent & meaning matters more. You can't automate authenticity. https://sceneswithsimon.substack.com/p/you-cant-automate-authenticity
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction