Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
A reminder on channels - Channels are *not* decentralized yet - Do not squat channel names with the intention to sell them to brands later; this is extractive behavior - When channels are decentralized and incorporated into the protocol later this year (likely onchain!), then you can do what you want! Just like FIDs
0 reply
29 recasts
287 reactions

Miko Matsumura pfp
Miko Matsumura
@miko
So what I'm hearing then is that when channels are decentralized then we will be able to squat channel names with the intention to sell them to brands later?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I don’t want squatting, but if something is decentralized you can’t stop it. :)
1 reply
1 recast
10 reactions

Miko Matsumura pfp
Miko Matsumura
@miko
This is why I support gradual decentralization. I see decentralization as tools for scaling trust when centralization can't be trusted. Right now, I trust you @dwr
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction