Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Wallet UX is an existential problem for Farcaster. If we don't make it easy for users to do things onchain and easy for developers to build farcaster apps, we can't scale the network. We're thinking about solutions right now, but want to share the problem statement the team is thinking about. Feedback welcome!
25 replies
66 recasts
145 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Would it make sense to have a multisig with 1/n for every user? Then each app will have to use their EOA, but one of the other apps will have to add it to the multisg.
3 replies
2 recasts
10 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I think world is moving from multisigs to smart contract wallets for consumer use cases?
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
SC wallets can be multisigs, it's a superset. Just a contract wallet with multiple signers.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Yeah, but smart contract includes a wider variety of designs
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I think we're just messing around with terminology. I'm not 100% sure, but I think a ERC-4337 wallet can also implement multisig functionality, it's not either or.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
Yea we're just saying add multiple signers to a smart contract in 1/N permission configuration. Call it what you will. That's where we're headed towards, especially when the Keystore Rollup is live: https://safe.global/blog/keystore-rollup-smart-account-interoperability
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
Btw this is also an issue that Coinbase Wallet is facing (consolidating multiple signers into one smart wallet) and is working on a solution in this direction. Might be worth chatting with their team?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Have been talking to them for a while. :)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
😀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
