Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Here's another way to look at the spam filtering problem. Consider this hypothetical? 1. Let's say you have a new account on the network (Account A) at they reply 100 times to the same account (Account B) with no engagement back. 2. It doesn't actually matter if Account A is run by a human or a bot with AI. 3. If you have 1000 accounts like Account B, Account A will just stop using the app. They'll move to another network or a messaging app. 4. Ideally, Account B would reply thoughtfully a few times and Account A engages with them, and then it increases over time as they build a relationship. 5. If you say "well 100 times is too much, but 50 times is fine", then you're admitting humans can be spammy and we're now arguing over the definition. 6. Side note: I don't think anyone is ready for a world where bots powered by AI are as interesting—or even more interesting—than humans.
26 replies
1 recast
61 reactions

ace pfp
ace
@ace
if i just like their replies, will they be considered engaged? sometimes there are too many replies so i have hard time replying to them on a given day even when they are real humans i like
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Yes. Also replying or following is a good signal.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

ace pfp
ace
@ace
good to hear your response to the community. sending kudos and trust to fc as always
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions