Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Looking for honest feedback—no need to sugarcoat. What's one thing that would make the Farcaster protocol better for you?
45 replies
24 recasts
54 reactions
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
tbh i'm not clear what the plan is for onboarding the next 200k users and I pay attention more than most it would be good to write some explainers & record some short videos for non-technical audience on what, when, how wrt users signing up, how apps use signers, who pays & how, spam controls
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Good feedback to write up longer thoughts, simple answers: 0. Targeting October 9th for permissionless sign ups 1. We don't anticipate 200K users to suddenly sign up after permissionless since sign ups will have $7 fee and increasing (surge pricing); have 6 weeks to iterate 2. Users pay protocol directly
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
3. Signers are required for storing / posting data to Hubs. Signers are onchain. Warpcast creates a signer for Warpcast users as part of sign up. Other apps can create signers outside of Warpcast, but it requires whatever Ethereum address that controls the Farcaster account to sign the transaction.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
4. Spam will be an iterative problem to solve for. Sign up fees should help but only 1 tool in a wider strategy. Clients will be responsible for spam filtering, similar to email. Would imagine 3rd party spam filtering services to pop up for developers.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
