Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Apex777
@apex777.eth
You make new accounts auto follow people, they interact with them and then get marked as spam? Doesn't feel right.
10 replies
1 recast
10 reactions
jon
@sweetleaf.eth
it's so rediculous, if you're casting to someone who isn't replying to you why the hell should that get marked as spam? they're already either not seeing or not replying to it on paper it sounded okay, but @dwr.eth's argument of "you're not entitled to anyone else's attention" as an excuse for the spam filtering doesn't really hold water whether or not one person or a small group of people gives you their attention or not should have no weight on your ability to get the attention of others
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Strong disagree. Repeated uninteresting replies hurt the network. No one should have to sit through mid content.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Edward H. Carpenter
@ehcarpenter
Didn't the reply-folk pay for their storage space, Dan? Who are you or I to judge what they do with their $5 worth of storage? 🤔 If they want to use it on "GM"s and "Cool meme"s, have they not paid for the right to do so? Personally, I find your own replies to these sorts of observations by the community to be peak "mid content" - repetitive and uninteresting. By now, we all know your bias. Many of us do not share it. Yet you continue to post it, and feel entitled to do so... it's an Alanis Morissette level of irony, IMO.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ruggy🧾🎩
@ruggy
How will the big account even see my cast to interact with when my replies are hidden. Be honest with yourself dwr. This is decentralized, you don’t have to police whatever content people make here, not everyone is an artist or a builder or whatever!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jon
@sweetleaf.eth
I agree with the core idea 100% but it does feel like solely basing what is interesting at the network level on subjective individual interest isn't the best way to go about it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
