Here's another way to look at the spam filtering problem. Consider this hypothetical?

1. Let's say you have a new account on the network (Account A) at they reply 100 times to the same account (Account B) with no engagement back.

2. It doesn't actually matter if Account A is run by a human or a bot with AI. 

3. If you have 1000 accounts like Account B, Account A will just stop using the app. They'll move to another network or a messaging app.

4. Ideally, Account B would reply thoughtfully a few times and Account A engages with them, and then it increases over time as they build a relationship.

5. If you say "well 100 times is too much, but 50 times is fine", then you're admitting humans can be spammy and we're now arguing over the definition.

6. Side note: I don't think anyone is ready for a world where bots powered by AI are as interesting—or even more interesting—than humans.

crypto millennials aren't writing enough banger casts...

Dan is pivoting to AI agents with rizz

gg humans, gg

🏗️ crypto builder  |  
👑 /degengame  |  
💸 paymagic.xyz  |  
🌐 nf.td/corbin

To be clear: we don't have plans. But it's clear this is where the entire world is headed. Will be pervasive everywhere.