There was this thread from 2005 in the Apple community, when the iPod shuffle came out, a bunch of people complained that the "iPod Shuffle" wasn't shuffled enough (it'd play songs from the last few days, felt not random) and so Apple had to implement a more 'shuffled' algo

I think something eventually similar is going to happen with AI, where people are going to say it's too perfect, and they want it to make mistakes and be human sometimes (doesn't feel human enough)

There was this thread from 2005 in the Apple community, when the iPod shuffle came out, a bunch of people complained that the "iPod Shuffle" wasn't shuffled enough (it'd play songs from the last few days, felt not random) and so Apple had to implement a more 'shuffled' algo

I think something eventually similar is going to happen with AI, where people are going to say it's too perfect, and they want it to make mistakes and be human sometimes (doesn't feel human enough)

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/250637

creating and destroying; built flying cars & autonomous vehicles, now building roc.camera, writings: july.rocks

I already feel this way about image generation in AI. The lack of originality is staggering. You can feel the machine trying to make it boring and assimilate outputs to knowns.

ᴄᴜʀɪᴏsɪᴛʏ ▁▂▃▄▅▆▇ 100%
ɴᴏᴡ ᴘʟᴀʏɪɴɢ ──────⚪──
 ⇄   ◃◃   ⅠⅠ   ▹▹   ↻
duaneking.twitter
moonshot.ooo

subjects are always positioned similarly and framed the same. I'm pretty good with prompts and have noticed it's getting continuously more difficult to get it to violate it's cookie cutter ruleset