words3

https://github.com/smallbraingames/words3-contracts/blob/dcd1033f5b500f342b4cfa77c920db0259b40ff1/src/libraries/LibPlay.sol#L256

Is it intentional that you can't play something next to a word, making 1 or more 2-letter words?

ex. putting TO here:

  T
TO
H
I
N
G

Building pods.media to help you collect conversations.

Yeah great question

To make the move above you'd need to make two txns (one to play the "O", and then the other to play the "T" on top of it)

This is for no other reason than keeping the contracts as simple as possible

Great eye, do u want to work on words3

The 2 txns kinda sucks if it's a bonus tile bc of this:

The 2 txns kinda sucks if it's a bonus tile bc of this:
https://github.com/smallbraingames/words3-contracts/blob/dcd1033f5b500f342b4cfa77c920db0259b40ff1/src/libraries/LibPoints.sol#L140

Can't you just return containsEmpty from checkWord instead of reverting?
(I'd invert and call it requiresCrossWords)
Then when playing, follow the checkCrossWords() with

if(requiresCrossWords && buildsOnPlayers == 0) revert LonelyWord();

Right, you’d just get the bonus once 

 Agreed it’s annoying in the case of a word bonus