Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions

wake 🎩 pfp
wake 🎩
@wake.eth
revoke.cash has a "revoke all" batch option that works great.
54 replies
23 recasts
89 reactions

--Dir3-- pfp
--Dir3--
@dir3
Do you think it would help to choose which tokens or contracts to revoke instead of doing all at once?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wake 🎩 pfp
wake 🎩
@wake.eth
it lists them for you. that alone is useful.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

--Dir3-- pfp
--Dir3--
@dir3
Could smart recommendations on risky permissions enhance the tool’s effectiveness?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wake 🎩 pfp
wake 🎩
@wake.eth
it should stay simple and let users decide what to keep or revoke, imo. it's not an alternative to personal responsibility and due dill.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

--Dir3-- pfp
--Dir3--
@dir3
Sorry but not all users can make informed choices and I feel guidance enhance safety.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

wake 🎩 pfp
wake 🎩
@wake.eth
that's of course true. but subordinating those decisions to AI (or forgoing work in favor of the AI as default) is not solution either. it's a bad teacher.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

--Dir3-- pfp
--Dir3--
@dir3
Because it leads to over dependency ?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wake 🎩 pfp
wake 🎩
@wake.eth
and misdirection, yeah.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

--Dir3-- pfp
--Dir3--
@dir3
So basically you just have to learn to do it yourself
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wake 🎩 pfp
wake 🎩
@wake.eth
you should know what you're signing before you sign it, not after.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

--Dir3-- pfp
--Dir3--
@dir3
But sometimes people jump into it for opportunity then think after ( I’ve made some pretty dumb decisions too )
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wake 🎩 pfp
wake 🎩
@wake.eth
of course. and darwin gets his fill.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

--Dir3-- pfp
--Dir3--
@dir3
Darwin would have loved my ass😭😂
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wake 🎩 pfp
wake 🎩
@wake.eth
try not to die 🌹
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction