Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/larry
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
df
@df
https://frame.weponder.io/api/questions/0fca6663-bde7-45cd-851c-d4c73581519d
4 replies
4 recasts
9 reactions
links 🏴
@links
So ponder only lets me submit one thing, but here’s an idea: instead of 15mins to crowdfund, make it adjustable up to 24hrs and have it token-gated. This allows a community to crowdfund a coin and then it actually feels like “their coin”
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Hoot 🎩
@owl
Larry bootstrapping phase feels too short and not visible enough. I always come late to the party :(
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ponder Surveys
@survey
💭 Your question got 20 responses after 12 hours. Reward responses directly in the frame. You can also read all of them here:
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ponder Surveys
@survey
💭 Your question got 20 responses after 12 hours. Reward responses directly in the frame. You can also read all of them here:
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BigHand
@bighand
As we need to attract investors from various blockchains, especially those in the currently popular Solana ecosystem. Lowering the barriers to entry would better attract these funds to participate in the Base and Larry platforms. Currently, Base already receives less attention compared to Solana, and people are less familiar with the Base ecosystem. If the Larry platform sets a high threshold, it will further hinder the enthusiasm of funds to participate. A good product should lower the usage barriers for users, rather than simply increasing these barriers to prevent snipers.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BigHand
@bighand
For the sake of compliance and privacy protection, tokens often need to be issued anonymously. Therefore, the existing mechanism should incorporate an anonymity feature. At the same time, the qualification restrictions on issuers should be removed, allowing anyone to issue tokens. Our goal is to restrict snipers, not issuers. As for the quality of the issued tokens, the decision to participate lies with the buyers themselves. Removing restrictions on issuers does not mean allowing unregulated issuance; participants will decide for themselves whether to purchase a particular project.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
