depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Something's not right with the web. No matter which version of it you believe we're currently on, the situation ain't ideal. We're missing fundamental pieces. https://depatchedmode.mirror.xyz/4t_7BUzz5q3XlPtH7EgtGL61nh9U8plsfH23i7x5_lU 🧡
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
We've hit the limits of our current IT stack. And it's severely limiting how we can interact with each other. To quote punk6529: You get the society your IT stack enables.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Not saying progress has halted. So many communities continue to contribute so much! But we often overstate our position on the roadmap. There has not been a Web 1, Web 2, or Web 3. Instead, there has been a Web 0.1, Web 0.2, and Web 0.3. We're still incrementing on Web 0.x
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
How do we know? Let's test a claim: "Regardless of my data literacy or technical proficiency, I must be empowered to make my own decisions with my data. To make the right decisions for me and for the communities I inhabit."
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Does this claim hold true today? No. In the worst case, it is not even possible for me to make the right decisions with my data (e.g. moving the personal relationships I've built on Facebook to another platform).
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
In the best case, it may be possible but is far from obvious to most how they would do it (e.g. moving my email history from Gmail to a new client). We have failed to meet an acceptable standard.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Simply making a secure outcome possible does not make it probable. Secure means so much more than just β€œsecurity at the technical layer.” It means enabling an environment and set of relations between individuals, that empowers communities to operate as they wish or need to.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
The broken systems we rely on today must do more. They must ensure our experiences are secure: designed thoughtfully enough to provide us with the agency we deserve. From concept, all the way down to code, and back up again: into the interfaces that govern our interactions.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
The experience of our digital existence must place every person, regardless of ability, in a position to be secure with their data. I've got a draft of 7 principles a truly secure system should adhere to. A secure system should be:
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
πŸ”΄ Easy & Obvious: Most vulnerabilities in a system occur when we find insecure workarounds, so the secure path must be the easiest and most obvious path for us to take.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction