Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
A quick technical review 🧵 on AT Protocol (Bluesky) and Farcaster. Both protocols have quite similar objectives, but they have very different design. First, identity. Both want account portability where user can migrate identity to a new service provider without existing server’s cooperation (unlike Fediverse).
22 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
ATP embraces generic standards in their design such as DID and DNS, which is good for extensibility and interoperability. However, in current implementation, they use their own DID method called DID Placeholder (PLC) because they aren’t satisfied with existing DID methods. 3/n
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
they seems to imply each user will have its own 'server', which is very hard to gain tracktion
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
whyrusleeping
@whyrusleeping
No, each user can choose a server. We expect to see several large instances with lots of users
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
