Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩  pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
enuff of the fluffs, to truly allow users "own" their data we need: 1. store data on their own server or locally on their device 2. store data on a public ledger/storage network with guaranteed data availability, and .. encrypted This is very different from owning assets where it is sufficient to just own the key
4 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩  pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
comparing to running their own "server", local-first seems to be the most viable approach as far as distribution and adoption are concerned
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

aferg pfp
aferg
@aaronrferguson.eth
Isn’t #2 what Storj does? Not only is data encrypted immediately at upload, but it’s sharded into like 60 pieces and geo-scattered. Something like 18-20 or so pieces are only needed to fetch/decrypt
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

notdevin  pfp
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
This is the self bank product I’m building because what you describe is exactly what I personally want also. Now combine that I own it with the fact that I’m willing to sell it in certain ways…
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

sean πŸ”Ή pfp
sean πŸ”Ή
@swabbie.eth
zk tech will do that. also possible with encrypted data stored in distributed systems and shared by request. no serious mass market product will require storage of large quantities of data locally.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction