DanielHeld
@defidaniel.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Optimism ($OP), Arbitrum ($ARB), and Starknet ($STRK) are key blockchain players, each with significant token locks. These tokens follow structured unlocking schedules that are publicly known. The aim is to gradually introduce tokens to balance liquidity and manage inflation. However, as tokens are unlocked and released, they can put downward pressure on the token's value, leading to increased inflation and potential dilution of existing holdings.
While these schedules provide stability and predictability, they also raise questions about their broader market impact. On one hand, they offer transparency, helping participants plan. On the other hand, they may reduce asset value over time, potentially penalizing holders. This situation invites reflection on whether such strategies effectively balance growth and stability or create undue pressure on token holders, affecting investment outcomes. The answer might hinge on one’s view of risk, reward, and market dynamics.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction