DeFi Cheetah pfp

DeFi Cheetah

@deficheetah

221 Following
47 Followers


DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
Things you should know about Dencun upgrade on 13 March! https://x.com/defi_cheetah/status/1766938688532173084
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
Hang in there man, same here 😂
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
Like this paper presenting quite a counter-intuitive view on increase in solvers’ competition in auction potentially causing worse price execution
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
Finally!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
With a16z’s bullish statement on @sreeramkannan , it’s time for those who haven’t deep dived into Eigenlayer to know more about it. My 🧵 1 year ago can serve as your starting point: https://x.com/defi_cheetah/status/1629348137784709120
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
2 questions: 1. “Winners… can force the solution to post end-of-block giving their off-chain procurement time to settle.“ can you elaborate more on this?? 2. For arbitrary SC, does that mean solvers could fulfil intent by making on-chain liquidity as the last resort in case of time out?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
Look forward to it!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tarun Chitra pfp
Tarun Chitra
@pinged
Going to give a *sneak peak* about this paper w/ @ksk and others to FC before Twitter! There's been a surge of interest in intent-based systems like @uniswapX or CoW Swap — their claim has been to help improve the acquisition of off-chain price data on-chain But do they work?
9 replies
23 recasts
96 reactions

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
I have been taking Taurine for quite some time 😂
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
Same thought! this is really something that I thought about before, because for long-tail assets it’s more risky for solvers to take the trade and thus I guessed there must be some premium on it, but you clarified it - the premium is actually due to the congestion fees
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
Then I think it could be split into 2 scenarios: solvers dealing with blue-chip tokens and long-tail tokens (with much less liquidity) The underlying dynamics could be totally different in these 2 separate cases
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
How about the status quo? If every time solvers have to at least execute and bid simultaneously, that could actually frustrate the purpose of having a competitive auction as the competition is translated into congestion fees lol
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
I see, so they execute simultaneously “just in case” 😂😂😂 But that sounds not very efficient if that’s the case lol
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
Would like to know how solvers incur congestion fees due to the lack of inventory, even before they secure the exclusive rights to the orderflow by winning the auction. Don’t they merely simulate the execution such that congestion fees don’t price in?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
Universal synchronous composability by @justindrake in his interview of @bankless could spark more app-chains, and @flashbots @hasu and counterparts probably have more tools to deal with cross-chain MEV https://x.com/defi_cheetah/status/1754585648164745520
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

DeFi Cheetah pfp
DeFi Cheetah
@deficheetah
1st post on Farcaster :D Will sync more research stuffs here Look forward to more interactions with researchers or anyone who are passionate about crypto here 🔥
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction