Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

✳️ dcposch on daimo pfp
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
I respect Privy. Offering a range of custodial and noncustodial options makes sense to me. It's important to be clear which is which! If your servers can generate access to user wallets (= the ones with "automatic recovery"), those wallets are custodial. https://warpcast.com/dcposch.eth/0xdc1f1df4
2 replies
14 recasts
110 reactions

notdevin  pfp
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
This is also a good write up from the silence team about nomenclature, personally I’m a fan of their model but I’d also like to hear from others about their thoughts on the definitions in here https://medium.com/silence-laboratories/redefining-nomenclature-of-custody-81ee28f20731
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Henri Stern Ꙫ pfp
Henri Stern Ꙫ
@henri
This is why we wrote the piece today (to provide clarity) and continue to push on the tradeoff space (w cloud and passkey recovery). There are security tradeoffs across these methods (and it’s why we offer different and are pushing here) but in all cases architected so Privy cannot access.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions