Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

✳️ dcposch on daimo pfp
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Credible neutrality is the difference between the high seas and Bob's waterpark. Technology ups the stakes. We have Twitter for public debate, the App Store for software, YouTube, Wikipedia, & more--critical, global, billion-person infrastructure that's nonetheless in the "waterpark" category. We're here to fix it.
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

✳️ dcposch on daimo pfp
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Here's a good example of what happens when you don't have credible neutrality. Bob's waterpark, Bob's rules. https://twitter.com/CharliePryor/status/1766531665898188981
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

✳️ dcposch on daimo pfp
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
In this case, there's a twist: Community Notes is public data, public algorithm. (Doing more than all the other web2 socials!) @bountybot $100 USDC bounty to download the data, run the algo & either prove or disprove the claim that Elon overrode it to remove a correct note from his post.
5 replies
0 recast
23 reactions

Gagan pfp
Gagan
@encrypted-soul
The community notes for this tweet is not present in the publicly available dataset. it seems like the data that is available for download was last updated on March 8th. However I downloaded the data and noticed that latest note in the dataset is much older than that, its Saturday, March 2, 2024 5:51:17.124 AM UTC
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Gagan pfp
Gagan
@encrypted-soul
however, i was able to scoop the http request to get the data for this particular tweet - https://pastebin.com/Veaaym2Y. Here is the response from this request - https://pastebin.com/usPEXZWq.
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

Gagan pfp
Gagan
@encrypted-soul
while its not possible to verify if the results of the model are correct without running the model on the complete updated dataset, if we assume that the results of the model are correct we can see that none of these tweets would appear in the community notes since ...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Gagan pfp
Gagan
@encrypted-soul
they all have a "rating_status" of either "NeedsMoreRatings" or "CurrentlyRatedNotHelpful". To be displayed on the tweet, a note must reach the "CurrentlyRatedHelpful" status - https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/about/introduction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Gagan pfp
Gagan
@encrypted-soul
`zestful-field-lorikeet` wrote the note we are seeing in the screenshot, while they have been rated as top writer and 13 of their notes have earned the status helpful its worth noting that 306 still require more rating. I would incline on the notes for the tweet in question is probably not tampered.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

✳️ dcposch on daimo pfp
✳️ dcposch on daimo
@dcposch.eth
Interesting, thanks. So… - The note was rated “helpful” at one point - Now, no longer displayed, so must be “not helpful” due to additional ratings - However, twitter says the author has no “not helpful”s Doesn’t quite line up. & great catch on them releasing data a week+ delayed
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Gagan pfp
Gagan
@encrypted-soul
Umm, no - one correction. No longer displayed because the note has been rated as NeedsMoreRatings presumably because of additional ratings.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Gagan pfp
Gagan
@encrypted-soul
Also i made a mistake regarding the latest note date in the community notes public dataset it is actually Friday, March 8, 2024 12:32:22.869 AM GMT. But yes not updated at a 24 hour cadence for sure.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction