Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

abranti pfp
abranti
@abranti
The Bear Case for Rocket Pool https://mirror.xyz/abranti.eth/I3zyd_QjTw6zIPhy7ypcup-FUvo6j6yD9RXeN8dZUyQ I am a builder, I like to focus on the positive and replace the negative by building. As an exception, I wrote a negative post on Rocket Pool. Hope this leads to constructive debate and helps the protocol improve.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

David Cann 🦁🍊πŸŸͺ pfp
David Cann 🦁🍊πŸŸͺ
@davidcann.eth
I’d like to see Rocket Pool find a way to let node operators have a some or all of their ETH be somewhat liquid. It would make the RPL pill easier to swallow.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

abranti pfp
abranti
@abranti
πŸ’―
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

David Cann 🦁🍊πŸŸͺ pfp
David Cann 🦁🍊πŸŸͺ
@davidcann.eth
Your suggestion of a competitor using an LST as collateral is interesting, but doesn’t that get into the realm of a restaking infinite loop? It sounds like leveraging stETH in a loop and increasing the risk of liquidation.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

abranti pfp
abranti
@abranti
It simply means that your collateral is being staked by a NO in the protocol (it could also be you). You are entitled to that collateral and its yield (without the commissions) however if you misbehave you don’t get to claim that eth back.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction